Ben-Hur:
A Tale of the Christ
a
film by William Wyler released through Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer in 1959

It was the last great triumph of the studio
system. No epic to follow could equal Ben-Hur.
Gone
With The Wind represents Old Hollywood at its peak, but M-G-M only released
it; legendary independent David O. Selznick made the movie. Ben-Hur,
in contrast, was expressly designed to save M-G-M from bankruptcy. It was their money on the line and it taxed
the abilities of their ablest help, even causing producer Sam Zimbalist’s
death, of heart attack.
It is a huge movie of one man and how
another man changed this man. That other
man was the Other-Man, Jesus Christ.
Even though our story focuses on the fictional Judah Ben-Hur, it
ultimately concerns the real-life Jesus of Nazareth, and the effect He has on
all of us.
Looking out on the unpopulated desert
wastes of New Mexico, General Lew Wallace could feel the heat and grit familiar
to a great civilization now lost. He was
imagining himself back in the time of Christ.
A lesser hero of the Civil War, the
General was the appointed governor of this hardscrabble land. Far from the refinements of the East, nearly
two thousand years separated him from the days of Christ’s work, but the
textures were the same. And the common
concerns of man had hardly changed since B.C. passed to the Years of Our
Lord—man was still searching out a path of salvation, no matter how temporal.
The General had already written a
novel, and was starting work on another, but found inspiration lacking. Then one day, he happened to meet renowned
agnostic Robert Ingersoll. Wallace was
forced to reconsider his own beliefs.
Never a strongly religious man, he endeavored to research the life of
Jesus and the efficacy of the Bible.
This was the path to Ben-Hur.
At our story’s beginning, Judah
Ben-Hur may be under the foot of Rome, but he commands everything under that
foot. He’s a prince of his people, one
of the wealthiest Hebrews, the pride of Jerusalem. He is generous to his slaves and enjoys the
company of a loving mother and sister.
Judah’s so great, he’s a touch boring.
We are introduced to him through the arrival of old friend Messala, whom
we’d watched marching his troops through Nazareth, under the eye of old
Joseph. Messala’s ready to lower the
iron fist on recalcitrant Judea, but hopes by giving Judah the velvet glove the
whole sordid business can be resolved quickly.
Pressured to betray his people, Judah is wounded, violently refusing. With old friends made enemies, now Judah’s character
development begins in earnest. He feels
sadness and regret. After the tiles
fall, he becomes exasperated, then white-hot angry. Once he’s wrongfully sent to the galleys and
his family tossed in prison, Judah becomes a man dead-set on making dog food of
Messala. Four years later something like justice prevails, in the arena.
But there is no end to revenge. Remembering too warmly Messala in his youth,
Judah turns his sights on the prime mover—Rome, of which, by a strange twist of
fate, Judah is now a part. His mother and sister are lepers, and there is no placating him. Pontius Pilate tells Judah that Messala went
overboard, and that with anything as large and far-reaching as the Roman
empire, terrible mistakes will be made.
But Judah thinks there was no mistake.
He knows Rome values men, like Messala, who ruthlessly maintain
order.
However, even as Rome rewarded
Messala for his actions, the choice and the will were Messala’s alone. Judah sees the problem as one of politics and
power, not of the heart. He fails to see
that evil transcends the daily affairs of man.
Environments that reward good and punish bad can soften its impact, but
the capacity for wrong doing lurks in the breast of every human being. Evil strikes anew, somewhere, every day, in
every generation. It continues,
undaunted by changes in political structure, contemptuous of our attempts to
regulate, outlaw, ban, substitute, and shame.
But Judah only sees the rotten fruit of evil, and not its deep
roots. As a consequence, Judah dismisses
the message of Christ. For him, as for
all of us, the laws of man do nothing to transform the heart.
As Jesus’s reputation grew, some
tried to tear Him down, especially religious leaders in the Jewish
community. Jealous of His popularity or genuinely
fearful that the teaching of this Nazarene could jeopardize the security of
their people, the Pharisees and Sadducees constantly challenged the validity of
His teachings, especially Jesus’s assertions of divinity. Other people embraced Jesus, but for the
wrong reasons, finding in His talk of a new kingdom a declaration of freedom
from Roman oppression. But Jesus was
referring to a hidden kingdom, beyond the principalities of this broken world. When He was seized and sentenced to die, His
misunderstanding boosters turned on Him with derision—to these, frustrated and
ashamed, Jesus was just another disappointment.
That’s how The King of the Jews could ride into Jerusalem to the acclaim
of her denizens, palm branches waving, and one week later find the same people
shouting for His crucifixion. They
wanted a Messiah to deliver them from physical bondage, not spiritual
bondage. Jesus wasn’t the king for them.
But Judah was afforded a different
perspective. He had encountered the Man
long before, when Jesus kept him alive on that brutal chain-gang march to the
sea. He gave him water that preserved
his life. But He also changed his
perspective. When he was lead away from
Nazareth, Judah stood tall. He looked at
his shackled hands in a way that says, ‘What concern is this? Though I’m physically bound, my soul has felt
the tug of freedom.’ Finding that a
“strange fate” has brought him full circle, he has the chance to return the
favor. When Jesus falls along the Via
Delarosa, Judah offers him an impromptu drink of water. But a cruel Roman kicks away the gourd before
Jesus can sip. Thus, eloquently
expressed, is a bracing truth—what Jesus accomplished for us, we cannot return
in kind. There is no good work we can
perform to set right what we’ve made wrong.
What Jesus gives He gives with no expectation of repayment.
So does Judah give up? Once he realizes that if anybody had cause to
seek revenge it’s this crucified King of the Jews, once he feels the sword
taken from his hand, does he forget about Rome?
Christ never said that His followers should remove themselves from the
world. They should render to Caesar what
is Caesar’s and render to God what is God’s.
But if Jesus can forgive, why can’t Judah Ben-Hur? He may still work for change, but an armed
rebellion (as we can suspect he was planning) is now unthinkable. Finally Judah can see beyond politics. He was always right to believe in the future
of his people. He still does. But through the work of Jesus Christ our hero
may finally realize, as Jesus hinted during His ministry, that God was calling
unto Himself a new chosen people, and that even as Romans abuse Hebrews, and
Hebrews curse Romans, all men malign God.
With our actions we express our contempt for God every day. Each of us, in rebellion, tear Him down and
take His place on the throne of the heart.
The love of God, perfectly expressed in the sacrifice of Jesus, conquers
all, not the arms of man. Indeed, if the
love of Christ can quench the thirst of Judah’s barren soul, what couldn’t it
do for the haughty practitioners of Roman might?
Judah expressed an understandable
frustration, lamenting that he would have been better off pouring that
proffered cup of water into the sand.
Because if this—a daily struggle against self, against others, fighting
back fear, barely grasping the futility of our earnest attempts to make sense
of it all in the face of impinging death—if this is all we’ve got, then life is
a cruel joke. We might as well get it
over with and just die now. But, as Ben-Hur so eloquently teases, “the world
is more than we know.”
Our film began with Christ in a
manger. Jumping ahead about thirty
years, we’re shown, through visual means, the imposition of imperial might on
the defeated Israelites, as Roman troops march through Nazareth. Joseph and a friend comment on their
presence, but Jesus is unconcerned with physical might—He’s up in the hills,
communing with the Father.
This armored company is headed by a
young man named Messala. Following him
to Jerusalem, we now meet an elder Roman, whom Messala is replacing as garrison
commander. Commenting on Jerusalem’s
truculent populace, the old commander says it’s not their strength of arms but
their strength of will that tax him.
Rome will never rule in their hearts.
He laments that this obstinacy is impossible to fight—threats, prison,
death—nothing works. Messala, the
ignorant hothead, is on the right track:
He replies that to fight an idea, offer another (another more
compelling, by implication). This is
what he tries to dangle before his old friend, Judah. He knows that Judah feels passionately about
his race, but Messala sees no hope for Jewish survival unless the Hebrews align
themselves with Rome. But Judah knows
better than to accept short-term glory at the expense of his, or his nation’s,
soul. He may be less aggressive than
younger men to whom he counsels patience, but, like them, he knows Israel will
find its way. And he knows that, sooner
or later, Rome will eat dirt. This
enflames Messala, who now sees his plans crumbling around him. The prior commander of the garrison was
right—these are a stubborn people. And
so Messala resorts to force. Ultimately,
of course, he is unsuccessful. But Judah
doesn’t kill Messala. In the great race,
Judah catches the whip that Messala foolishly directs at him. With their chariots entangled, Messala’s
crumples, and he is fatally trampled.
Both men hate each other and wouldn’t mind seeing the other die. And it is Messala who falls.
But Judah finds no satisfaction in
his old friend’s death.
So now Rome is worried. Judah is more powerful than ever, and he’s
ready to snare a bigger fish. Pontius
Pilate tries to handle him gently, this extraordinary man who has survived
against all odds and has bases of power in Rome and Jerusalem. Again,
Judah won’t hear of compromise or conciliation.
Pilate, keeping his cool, threatens him, but he’s cagey enough to stay
vague. Ultimately, of course, he’s got
force in mind, too.
All this time we’ve been granted
glimpses of Jesus at work, a Man for our world, but never ensnared by it. He moves just above it all, a beacon of
sanity for the distressed and broken.
But Judah’s not buying it. He deals in reality, and to him that means
struggle. When he first met the
man who would become his adopted father, Arius, with approval, saw Judah’s
defining characteristic as hate. Later
in the film, Balthasar saw the same dangerous intent behind the eyes. Rage—it’s all Judah knows, and he has nothing
more at his disposal than blind brute force.
But that won’t topple Rome, and it won’t bring him peace.
Judah doesn’t believe in the unifying
power of one government to lead mankind against barbarianism (Messala’s
probable philosophy) any more than the Romans believe in his concept of free
will, decency, and mercy for conquered peoples.
No, he just threatens them like they threaten him. Neither side has an idea powerful enough to
generate an overwhelming paradigm shift.
But Jesus does. Though it took a
circuitous road getting there, many of the old Jewish descendents, now
Christians, convinced the Romans of the efficacy of their faith, and eventually
Rome adopted Christianity as its official religion, just before collapsing on
itself. It wasn’t Rome becoming Jewish
or the Hebrews adapting to Roman ways—it was an idea, Christianity, which
brought unity, reconciling the irreconcilable.
There is no end to pain in this
world. The agony of Judah’s mother when
she reports that Tirzah is dying is as sad as this movie gets. But though leprosy is now a rare occurrence,
there is AIDS. And though we don’t see
chain gangs force-marched to the sea, we do hear ghastly tales of whole
religious and ethnic groups wiped out in machete raids. Just as for General Wallace, two thousand
years separate us from the work of Christ, but the textures are the same, and
the need for transcendence still remains.
Ben-Hur is a passionate film
that inspires and comforts. It is not
pedantic nor condescending. It takes a
serious subject and handles it respectfully.
It is not as much a sermon as it is a question: Can anything separate us from the love of
Christ?