Superman
Redux
In
Superman
III, Kal-El, in his Clark Kent
guise, takes on Kal-El in his Superthug guise.
It’s the junkyard brawl. Clark
wins, putting an end to the internal conflict that had left the citizenry
bewildered and scared. With the release
of Superman Returns, we now have two
cinematic Supermans to compare. But
that’s easy. Brandon Routh is excellent,
just a notch below Christopher Reeve.
The movies are tougher. Superman
III and Superman IV: The Quest For
Peace are passingly enjoyable, but strip the super-hero of his stature and
dignity. Emerging from the junkyard
brawl of development hell, Superman
Returns helps supplant the more disagreeable impressions left by III and IV. The first two movies,
still highly regarded, serve as the template.
Accordingly, Superman Returns
further develops the introspective themes of Superman II, the film in which Kal-El aspired to be human. Superman
Returns seems to pick up somewhere after Superman II, but any critical approach to Superman Returns must consider the example of the original, Superman, released in 1978. Both that film and its 28-year junior set the
parameters for what the cinematic Superman is.
And with Superman Returns
we’ve gone one step forward and two steps back.

Superman
is a flawed classic, sharing with Superman
Returns a penchant for wandering narrative threads, but the original stands
superior for its witty dialogue and its score.
The cast for this sequel is of equal caliber to the original’s. James Huntington brings a little more
maturity to the Jimmy Olsen role than did Mark McClure. But both characterizations work because in
the original, Clark Kent was the new guy, feeling out of place, which is
exactly how young Jimmy felt. And so
they bonded. Now, with several years
behind them, they’ve both grown more comfortable on the job. Frank Langella could match Jackie Cooper on
the Perry White role if Langella was given more to do than just stare and brood
in his office while the world falls apart outside. Parker Posey does an admirable job as
Luthor’s worthless moll, her character maintaining the glamour of Valerie
Perrine’s Miss Teschmacher, sans the stylized sex appeal. Posey’s character, Kitty Kowalski, takes some
interesting turns near the end. We think
she’ll save Superman (just as Miss Tesmacher did) but she ignores her
conscience until she, sobbing, abandons the invaluable crystals. Her character is actually at its best in her
first scene, in which she’s posing as a maid in the Vanderworth mansion. She’s beautiful, mysterious, and amusing,
relieved to drop the whole charade at last.
Kevin Spacey bests Gene Hackman only
because Spacey is willing to shave his head.
They’re both great as Lex Luthor.
And Kate Bosworth adds Superman-weariness to the established
world-weariness of the Lois Lane character.
She’s displays the same reckless fever to snare the Big Story, but now
she’s got more people to think about than herself. And, thankfully, she no longer treats Clark
like a piece of gum stuck on her (4-inch platform?!) shoes.
For the big man himself, Routh can’t
seem to channel into his characterization the mythic stature of Superman, but
actually bests Christopher Reeve in the Clark Kent department, making the
character less a caricature of the man from the farm. This Clark Kent is the real man, more so than
the one with the tight blue suit and boots.
Routh complements Christopher Reeve’s interpretation without negating
it.
But too often the film plays like one
big homage to the original movie. Half
of the good lines are lifted from Superman. Instead of outrunning a locomotive, now young
Clark (in flashback) leaps over not-so-tall buildings in a single bound. Lex still wants land and Lois still can’t
spell her lurid headlines. Clark still
says “swell.” And Marlon Brando makes a
cameo appearance from the grave. The
credit sequence has similar swooping titles, but insists on taking us on a
dizzying roller coaster ride through space instead of majestically drawing us
into the story. Much of that cherished Superman score is worked into Superman Returns. However, John Ottman’s own themes don’t
resonate, and John Williams’s original music blasts through the directionless
underscore like a trumpet playing “Taps.”
The more Williams's music is referenced, the more Ottman’s suffers
in comparison.
Like Superman, this film could do with a little cutting. What should go is some of the early scenes
with Luthor. The blackout and Lois’s
capture drag and drag, because we already know what is going on. If we had left Luthor in the fortress, only
knowing he had arrived there by helicopter, and had seen him steal the crystals
but not knowing to what end, we would enjoy some delicious anticipation. Once the electronic-pulse-blackout happens we
would guess it has to do with Luthor but would still be allowed to imagine the
explanation. This is audience
empowerment at its best. Indeed, all the
model railroad scene gives us, besides beautiful toy trains, is the idea that
Lex has unusual intelligence and his gang should respect him. Okay, so they
may need to learn it, but since Luthor shrewdly cons the old lady early on, and
especially since this movie is just the continuation of earlier ones, we don’t need to see it. Preserve the
mystery, help our identification with Lois by giving the audience and the
character the same goal—discovering the cause of the blackout. Tirelessly digging, Lois is told by the
electric company the address where the problems started. (And neither the utility nor law enforcement
care to look in on what was going on there?)
This lazy screenwriting continues with Lois’s decision to investigate
the yacht, with her son. This could have
been terrifically exciting. Remember,
Luthor bilked the old lady in a mansion and we saw in that mansion a model of a
yacht. That’s enough for us to know that
when Lois pulls up to the mansion, Luthor is lurking about.
So Lois searches the yacht with her
son. (After all, when she’s captured,
the screenwriters consider, the son has to be along so he can demonstrate his
super-powers to the audience and so Lois Lane’s lover can rescue both of them
for a bracing reunion.) But Lois, though
intrepid and a little reckless, surely would not put her son in danger like
this. She doesn’t know who or what is on
that boat. And we can’t explain her
behavior away. She worries about little
Jason, and does not blithely trust in his super-pedigree. She offers Luthor anything he wants
(including her body, we infer) if Luthor will let the boy go. Cut all of that earlier mess out, in the
mansion and on the yacht, and Luthor is more unpredictable, his schemes are
more shocking, his threats are more menacing; we’d be pulled into the story
rather than left to observe it from a distance.
And we’d save ten or fifteen minutes.
But the failings of the script do not
end there, sadly.
Moving through the film, the idea
that Superman has been gone to check out Krypton is totally empty. We’re told astronomers found evidence of its
remains and Superman decided to check it out.
This took many years. And yes, we
know that he wants to learn more about his past and yes, we realize he probably
wanted to escape the daily torture of the Daily Planet newsroom, always
wrestling impotently with his feelings for Lois. But Superman should have discovered something
up there, or the whole matter should have been clearly revealed as a hoax
designed by Lex Luthor to lure Superman away from Earth, in order to free Lex
from prison (when Superman is not around to testify).
Superman crashes back to Earth after
we follow the kitchen routine of Martha Kent.
In this and a subsequent scene talking with his adoptive mother on the
couch, we learn nothing. Apart from the
joy of seeing Eva Marie Saint in a major motion picture, it’s all a waste of
time. Particularly bothersome in these
Smallville scenes is Clark’s decision to deny the family dog a game of catch by
throwing the baseball miles away. He never
apologizes to the dog, it’s too predictable to be funny, and so he comes across
as indifferent and playfully cruel before the story’s even started.
Soon after this, Lois is trapped
aboard a plummeting airliner, which provides a personal motivation for Superman
to get back into action. She is bounced
around a lot—with no purpose, because she emerges unscathed! Just keep her strapped in like everyone else
because what we’ve got here is just dumb show.
The magical crystals which contain
unfathomable amounts of information are stolen by Luthor from the Fortress of
Solitude. Luthor explains the power of
the crystals to his skeptical hoods.
This is necessary exposition in light of the story’s big idea—Luthor
using Superman’s technology to dominate the earth. It’s an agreeably ironic conceit, but with
Luthor’s explanation, believability and mystery drop precipitously. Superman
showed us an advanced civilization with simplistic technology. What this technology could accomplish was
extraordinary, but fully believable (in the context of the story) because we
could not see the mechanism that made it happen. Nothing is explained, we’re just witness to
it, documentary style. As a result, we
cannot judge whether the technology makes sense. And so, we can enjoy the story more
fully. The crystals supplanted the
perfunctory ‘blinking lights’ super-computer-driven world of ’60s and ’70s
science fiction films. For the first
time an advanced civilization was portrayed as having advanced into sheer
simplicity. This and the turning back of
the world are the two original ideas in Superman. But now, with Luthor having to explain what
the crystals can do and why they can do it, the magic is lost.
Even more galling, in the original
movie a single green crystal possessed the power to unleash the catatonic
forces that produced the Fortress of Solitude.
In Superman Returns the clear crystals
have the same power to bring forth land.
This is a cheap sleight of hand for filmmakers otherwise determined to
maintain consistency with the original film.
And
so, lured to Lex Luthor’s dour Atlantic landmass, our hero doesn’t seem to pay
any thought to the threat of Kryptonite.
First of all, Superman should have quietly ensured that all known
Kryptonite be removed from the earth.
It’s the only thing that can touch him, Luthor has used it before, but
Superman rushes right in. Okay, so he
can’t feel himself weakening when he walks across the Kryptonite-laced
landscape. Fair enough, but why does
Luthor, after stabbing Superman once, allow him to fall into the
ocean? In the water Superman can drown (again echoes of the original) but he will be further away from the
Kryptonite-laced rock. The only way to
work it is for Luthor to stab Superman one hundred times and wait until he
dies, and then cut his body up in little pieces and set them on fire. And if that’s too violent for the picture,
then the confrontation between hero and villain requires a different setting.
And last, a huge problem is
Superman’s recovery. Nothing gets him
out of the hospital bed. Lois visits
with their son, but he doesn’t rally. He
departs, off screen, after they have left.
What was it that saved him?
Medicine is a boring reason, and if it is a result of Lois’s visit, than
this should be obvious. The whole
episode at the hospital is entirely wrong for the character. If he’s going to be near death, he should be
alone or with someone he loves—Lois or Mother Kent. With all the medical personnel crowding
around his prostrate form, the sequence takes on the flavor of E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial where the
creature is fruitlessly attended to by ignorant physicians. In fact, Superman
Returns not only copies the original Superman,
but Goldeneye (the expectant pause
while a plane that may crash passes out of frame), Terminator 2 (bad guy destroying police cars from a rooftop with a
Gatling gun) and Armageddon (numerous
shots of ethnically-diverse masses staring helplessly into the sky, silently
pleading for salvation).
Superman
may best Superman Returns by default,
on the basis of originality, but in addition to the afore-mentioned dialogue
and music, Superman is also better
looking, and won a Special Achievement Academy Award for visual effects. That movie looks real, while half of Superman Returns looks like a Superman
cartoon. After all these years, computer
graphic images still don’t match up to the real thing, and on a film that cost
$200 million, it’s very doubtful using all those computers saved the producers
money. There is no excuse.
Sometimes the old way is better. And rarely does a sequel best its predecessor.